Bug #112
ipv6 policy routing should be used
| Status: | New | Start date: | 05/05/2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | High | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | - | Spent time: | 1.00 hour | |
| Target version: | Cerowrt-Next | Estimated time: | 16.00 hours |
Description
In the presence of multiple ipv6 tunnels, a shortest path match should be done and attempts to send a 6in4 tunnel out a 6to4 tunnel (and vice versa) should be blocked.
History
Updated by Dave Täht about 2 years ago
- Category set to OPENWRT
- Target version set to World IPv6 Day
- Estimated time set to 16.00
Policy routing is required to be built into the kernel. There may also be a dependency on iproute2.
There needs to be a policy routing configuration file that talks more to the "right thing" in the presence of multiple 2002 and 2001 tunnels as well as in the presence of native ipv6.
Then the 6to4 and 6in4 and other ipv6 scripts need to be modified to use policy routing when available.
Updated by Dave Täht about 2 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to High
Updated by Dave Täht almost 2 years ago
- Project changed from Überwrt to Wisp6
- Category deleted (
OPENWRT)
Updated by Dave Täht over 1 year ago
- Priority changed from High to Urgent
- Target version changed from World IPv6 Day to 1st Public Cerowrt release
Well, after finally gaining access to a 2002 and 2001 enabled network, with 4 gateways, policy routing suddenly became a major issue worth trying to fix. Otherwise, weirdnesses ensue that are really hard to track down.
Updated by Dave Täht over 1 year ago
- Project changed from Wisp6 to Cerowrt
Updated by Dave Täht over 1 year ago
- Priority changed from Urgent to High
- Target version changed from 1st Public Cerowrt release to 13
and after fiddling with it, it's tricky and involves too much stuff and I'm the only one with 4 ipv6 enabled gws I know of.
Updated by Dave Täht about 1 year ago
- Target version changed from 13 to Cerowrt-Next