Feature #219
dropbear should run out of xinetd
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | 08/02/2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | % Done: | 0% |
||
| Category: | Networking | Spent time: | 0.50 hour | |
| Target version: | 1st Public Cerowrt release |
Description
I had planned to do this for a while now. Our dropbear is already patched to be runnable out of xinetd, I have half a patch to make xinetd oom-killer aware, and there's half a xinetd sensors package around that locks out people (bots, actually) entirely that attempt telnet to the router.
I feel uncomfortable skipping the oom-killer patch, but as fiddling with dropbear and doing it wrong would be bad, getting dropbear to work out of xinetd first, correctly, strikes me as the least risky, so I MAY given time, move dropbear to xinetd and get the sensors package working
before RC5.
History
Updated by Dave Täht almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Assignee set to Dave Täht
dropbear now runs out of inetd.
Also, sensors are configured on telnet and ftp attempts to the router.
Updated by Dave Täht over 1 year ago
Why are there bugs I can't CLOSE?
Updated by Dave Täht about 1 year ago
- Category set to Networking
Updated by Dave Täht about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
dropbear could use some improvement, yes, both on oom, and on max-cpu behavior.
but the oom bug is separate.